Think Your Family Court Judge Is Biased? Here's What to Do
Under the Ebner test, apprehended bias requires a fair-minded observer to reasonably fear the judge is not impartial. Unfavourable rulings alone are not bias.
Read MoreWe establish custody arrangements and court orders that prioritize children's wellbeing while protecting your parental rights.
Every family law matter is unique. We take the time to understand your goals, explain your options in plain language, and develop a strategy that protects both your rights and your wellbeing.
We craft parenting arrangements that prioritise the welfare of each child, using child-inclusive practices, negotiated parenting plans, or court-ordered consent orders tailored to complex family dynamics.


Principal Lawyer
Principal Family Lawyer
Gloria Zhao is an Australian-qualified family law solicitor with over eight years of experience guiding clients through complex property, parenting and cross-border disputes. She has acted in more than 1,600 matters and is known for strategic, results-driven advocacy.
Beyond the courtroom, Gloria is committed to legal education. She regularly creates bilingual family law content to help the community understand their rights and make confident decisions.
A Parenting Plan is a written agreement between parents about the care arrangements for their children after separation. It is made outside of court without the need for lawyers or judicial approval.
A Parenting Plan is an informal private agreement that is not legally enforceable in court. Parenting Consent Orders are court-approved orders that have the force of law and can be enforced if breached.
No, many parents reach agreements privately or through mediation without involving the court. Court is typically a last resort when parents cannot agree.
No, a Parenting Plan is not legally enforceable. However, it can be evidence of your agreed intentions and may be considered by a court if disputes arise later.
The court's paramount consideration is the best interests of the child (FAMILY LAW ACT 1975 - SECT 60CA). This overrides all other considerations including parents' wishes.
Factors include: the benefit of having a meaningful relationship with both parents; protecting the child from harm, abuse, neglect or family violence; the child's views (depending on maturity); the child's relationship with each parent and other important people; the practical difficulty and expense of the child spending time with each parent.
The child doesn't have to, but the court will consider the child's views if they are mature enough. The weight given to the child's views depends on their age and maturity.
No, there is no presumption of equal time. The court considers what arrangement is in the child's best interests, which may or may not be equal time.
Yes, significantly. The court must consider protecting children from harm caused by family violence. A history of violence can affect both the time spent and the type of care arrangements.
Yes, but this requires either both parents' consent or a court order. The court will consider the child's best interests and any flight risks.
Only with the other parent's consent or a court order. Relocation cases are complex and the court must be satisfied it's in the child's best interests.
Yes, if there has been a significant change in circumstances. Either parent can apply to the court to vary the orders.
Yes, you can. However, a Parenting Plan cannot be legally enforced if the other parent doesn't follow it. For enforceability, you need Consent Orders.
No, Australian family law does not favour either parent based on gender. The focus is entirely on what is in the best interests of the child.
Consider seeking legal advice when: negotiations are difficult; there is family violence; complex assets are involved; international elements exist; or you need help understanding your rights and options.
No, parenting orders deal with care arrangements. Child support is a separate matter dealt with through Services Australia or a private agreement.
Explore more case studies and professional insights
Under the Ebner test, apprehended bias requires a fair-minded observer to reasonably fear the judge is not impartial. Unfavourable rulings alone are not bias.
Read MoreUnder the Family Law Act 1975, courts order breath tests and supervised visits for alcoholic parents. Rehab completion alone won't restore custody.
Read MoreUnder section 60CC of the Family Law Act 1975, courts assess how parental alcohol abuse affects the child's best interests and can reduce custody to supervised contact.
Read MoreDon't navigate your legal challenges alone. Our experienced team is here to provide the guidance and representation you need for your family law matters.
Comprehensive legal services tailored to your family law needs. Our experienced team provides professional guidance through every step of your legal journey.
View All →Ready to discuss the specifics of your situation? Reach out to arrange a confidential consultation with our family law team today.
Contact Us →